The Abrahamic Covenant: Before or After the Near-Sacrifice?

🌟 The Abrahamic Covenant: Before or After the Near-Sacrifice?


The Abrahamic covenant is central to the shared heritage of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. Yet a key question remains: Was this covenant established before or after the near-sacrifice of Abraham’s son? The answer depends on how the scriptures are read and how different traditions interpret the sequence of events.


⸝


1. The Canonical Biblical Order


According to the Hebrew Bible/Old Testament, the Abrahamic covenant is established before the episode of sacrifice:


• Genesis 15 — God pledges to Abraham countless descendants and grants him the land of Canaan.

• Genesis 17 — The covenant is reaffirmed; Abraham receives his new name, circumcision is instituted as its sign, and the promise of nations and kings through his offspring is declared.

• Genesis 22 — Only afterward does the narrative describe the “Akedah” (binding of Isaac), where Abraham is commanded to sacrifice his son.


In this canonical sequence, the covenant precedes the sacrifice, with the latter serving as a divine test of Abraham’s loyalty and faith.


⸝


2. The Qur’anic Perspective — Covenant After the Sacrifice


The Qur’an reorders the logic of the covenant. Instead of covenant preceding sacrifice, the covenant is bestowed after Abraham’s obedience in the trial of sacrifice:


• Surah al-Saffāt (37:100–113): Abraham sees in a vision that he must sacrifice his son (identified in Islamic tradition as Ishmael). Both father and son submit, but God ransoms the son with a great sacrifice, showing the fullness of their submission (islām).

• Surah al-Baqarah (2:124): This verse makes explicit that the covenant of leadership (imāmah) came after Abraham fulfilled his trials:

“And when Abraham was tested by his Lord with certain words and he fulfilled them, He said: ‘I have appointed you as a leader for the people.’ Abraham said: ‘And of my descendants?’ He said: ‘My covenant does not include the wrongdoers.’”


Here, covenantal authority is not automatic but conditional — awarded only after demonstrated faith.


Key Implications:


1. Obedience Before Covenant: The trial of sacrifice is the turning point that secures Abraham’s role as leader.

2. Ishmael’s Role: Since Ishmael is the son identified with the sacrifice, the covenant is understood to extend through him, culminating in the building of the Kaaba (Qur’an 2:125–129).

3. Conditional Covenant: The Qur’an stresses that covenantal blessings apply only to the righteous line of descendants.


Thus, from the Qur’anic perspective, the covenant is not pre-declared but ratified after Abraham’s supreme act of submission.


⸝


3. Scholarly Reordered Reading of Genesis


Some modern interpreters also suggest that Genesis itself may be read in a reordered fashion:


1. Genesis 22 (Sacrifice): Abraham’s willingness to sacrifice his son demonstrates his ultimate faith.

2. Genesis 22:17 (Promise): God then promises to multiply Abraham’s descendants “as the stars of heaven and the sand on the seashore.”

3. Genesis 17 (Covenant): Abraham is finally declared “father of many nations” as a consequence, not a precondition.


This reading highlights Ishmael’s unique position: as the firstborn, circumcised before Isaac’s birth, Ishmael stands as the covenantal son through whom nations would arise.


⸝


4. Summary of Perspectives


• Jewish & Christian Tradition (Canonical Order):

Covenant (Gen 15 & 17) → Near-sacrifice (Gen 22).

• Qur’anic Understanding:

Sacrifice (37:100–113) → Covenant confirmed (2:124) → Kaaba (2:125–129).

• Scholarly Reordering:

Genesis 22 (obedience & promise) → Genesis 17 (father of many nations).


⸝


Conclusion


The question of whether the Abrahamic covenant was established before or after the sacrifice reveals profound theological differences.


• For Judaism and Christianity, the covenant is given first and tested later.

• For Islam, the covenant is established after Abraham’s trial of sacrifice, highlighting obedience as the gateway to divine leadership.

• For some scholars, Genesis itself is better read as sacrifice first, covenant second.


What unites all perspectives is the recognition that Abraham’s faith and obedience stand at the heart of God’s covenantal promise — whether as foundation, condition, or ultimate confirmation.


— Azahari Hassim

Founder, The World of Abrahamic Theology

Contents