🕋📜 Abraham's Near Sacrifice: Why Is There No Commemoration in the Torah?

✨ Introduction

One of the most striking stories in the Torah is the Akedah (Binding of Isaac), narrated in Genesis 22. God commands Abraham to sacrifice his son—identified in the text as Isaac—before staying his hand at the final moment. Yet, despite the weight of this story, there is a puzzling silence: the Torah contains no command to commemorate this event.

This absence has led some scholars to question whether the original narrative might have been different, with implications that reach into comparative Jewish–Islamic theology.

⸻

📖 Textual Observation

• Genesis 22:2 explicitly names Isaac as the son Abraham was told to offer.

• However, nowhere in the Torah is there any ritual, feast, or commemorative practice linked to this moment.

This silence stands out because the Torah often anchors Israel’s identity around commemorations—Passover recalls the Exodus, Shavuot recalls the giving of the Law, and Sukkot recalls the wilderness journey. But the near-sacrifice, arguably a more dramatic test of faith, receives no ritual memory.

⸻

🕋 Comparative Lens: Islam’s Commemoration

In Islam, the event is central. Muslims worldwide commemorate it every year through Eid al-Adha (Festival of Sacrifice):

• 🐑 Animal sacrifice (qurbani)

• 🤲 Special prayers

• 🍖 Distribution of meat to the poor

• 🌍 A global, unifying ritual

This celebration underscores the living memory of Abraham’s trial, which Islam associates with Ishmael, not Isaac.

⸻

❓ Scholarly Questions and Implications

The contrast raises probing questions:

• Why would the Torah omit a commemoration for such a profound event?

• Could this silence reflect discomfort with the story’s original version?

Scholars note that if Isaac was indeed the intended child, it would be unusual for the Torah not to commemorate this event through ritual practice, similar to how it does with other significant moments.⸻

🏺 Historical-Critical Perspective

Some argue that the naming of Isaac in Genesis 22:2 may have been a later addition. The logic is simple:

• If Ishmael were the original son in the story, his association with Abraham’s line through Hagar may have been downplayed or overwritten by later Israelite scribes.

• The absence of commemoration may betray this alteration—since commemorating it with Isaac would have been theologically awkward for later Jewish tradition.

Thus, the silence may preserve a trace of an older memory—one more aligned with the Islamic perspective.

⸻

🔍 A Scholarly Framework

The argument is articulated in three steps:

1. Observation of Silence: No Torah command to remember the Akedah (Binding of Isaac).

2. Comparative Analysis: Islam enshrines it through Eid al-Adha, Judaism does not.

3. Textual Suspicion: The absence of commemoration, alongside the centrality of Isaac’s name, suggests a possible textual evolution.

This framework places the Torah and Qur’an side by side, not only as sacred texts but as historical witnesses to how traditions remember—or forget—the same event.

⸻

🌟 Conclusion

The absence of commemoration for the Binding of Isaac in the Torah is not a trivial gap. It raises profound questions about memory, identity, and textual history. For Jewish tradition, the Akedah (Binding of Isaac) is a story of covenant loyalty but not a festival. For Islam, the same trial—reinterpreted through Ishmael—is one of the greatest annual commemorations.

The silence in the Torah may thus speak louder than words, hinting at a deeper history of textual reshaping and theological divergence between the children of Abraham.

— Azahari Hassim

Founder, The World of Abrahamic Theology